Active managers who beat their respective indexes are a rare breed. Those who can consistently beat the
S&P 500
are rarer still.

Ann Holcomb, research director and portfolio co-manager of the $10.3 billion
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research
fund (ticker: PRCOX) is in this exclusive club, having bested—along with a team of about 30 research analysts—the S&P 500 index for the past five years on an annualized basis.

U.S. Equity Research is a Morningstar five-star gold-medal fund. It has no load and charges a low, 0.45% annual fee. Year to date, it’s up 18.6%, versus the S&P 500’s 15.5% gain. The fund beats the broad market and its Morningstar peers on a one-, three-, and five-year annualized basis. Over the past five years, the fund has returned 12.3% versus its peers’ average return of 10.1% and the S&P’s 11% gain. Those wins put U.S. Equity Research in the top 9% of its peers.

The fund’s strategy is twofold. Individual portfolio analysts conduct deep bottom-up fundamental research to find stocks in their respective industry coverage areas and overweight their top picks, while Holcomb and her portfolio co-managers, Jason Polun and Jason Nogueria, maintain strategy oversight.

U.S. Equity Research’s industry weights are similar to those of the S&P 500, and analysts get a representative slice to manage, overweighting preferred names and selling least-preferred stocks to buy others. The weighting differences are slight, as the total portfolio is limited to a 1% overweight or underweight versus the index, but it’s enough to make a material return difference.

Analysts may own a handful of non–S&P 500 large-cap stocks, although the entire portfolio’s non–S&P 500 weighting is limited to 10%. It’s currently at 4.5%. Sometimes, U.S. Equity Research owns names before they’re added to the index.
Lululemon Athletica
(LULU) is a recent example, and Holcomb says the fund owned Google (now
Alphabet
[GOOG]) for about six months before it joined the S&P 500.

“That can be a nice source of relative performance,” she says, as a company’s share price often gets a bump when the stock is added to an index because index-following funds must add the name.

Total Return
1-Yr 3-Yr 5-Yr
PRCOX 20.8% 9.9% 12.2%
Large Blend Category 14.3 8.2 10.1
Top 10 Holdings
Company / Ticker % of Net Assets
Microsoft / MSFT 7.4%
Apple / AAPL 6.9
Alphabet / GOOG 4.0
Amazon.com / AMZN 3.5
Nvidia / NVDA 3.4
Meta Platforms / META 2.0
Eli Lilly / LLY 1.8
UnitedHealth Group / UNH 1.5
Tesla / TSLA 1.4
Berkshire Hathaway / BRK.B 1.3
TOTAL 33.2%

Note: Holdings as of Oct. 31. Returns through Nov. 6; three- and five-year returns are annualized.

Sources: Morningstar, T. Rowe Price

The portfolio managers work closely with the analysts in scrutinizing market exposures, adjusting position size as needed, based on the risk profile of both the individual investment sleeves and the entire portfolio.

“Each analyst has to understand what’s different about their space, what makes the stocks work within their space,” Holcomb says. “As portfolio managers and directors of research, we’re laser-focused on ‘Oh my gosh, what could go wrong next year?’ ”

Holcomb was named co-manager and research director in 2015, but she has been involved with the fund since its 1994 founding by William Stromberg, who later served as T. Rowe Price’s CEO, and Richard Whitney. Their process of relying on analyst picks—with the directors of research providing extra accountability—remains intact, she says.

Holcomb and her co-managers oversee distribution of active weights in the portfolio as well as the risk profile of each sleeve, including subsectors, while considering the fund’s overall style, factor, and sector allocations to ensure that the whole portfolio shadows the benchmark. These risk-related measures allow U.S. Equity Research to produce higher risk-adjusted returns versus peers, according to Morningstar.

“That helps isolate what we think our analysts do best, which is select stocks in their small area of expertise,” she says. “Over the past 24 years, that has led to consistency of relative returns.”

Holcomb credits this year’s strong performance to the team’s stock selection, an impressive feat, given that the S&P 500’s rally was driven by just a handful of tech names. Overweighting tech stocks such as No. 3
Nvidia
(NVDA) undoubtedly helped U.S. Equity Research, but she says the fund’s gains were broadly based.

“I’m not sure I ever remember a year where we had about 90% of our analysts outperforming their own benchmark. It’s truly astounding,” she says.

The fund has held Nvidia since 2018, and Holcomb says the analyst still has a “very favorable” view of the high-end graphics processing unit company. She credits how analysts’ deep research leads them to uncover insights or differentiated views before the market does. The analyst expects the company’s moat to expand as it gets into autonomous driving and other markets, suggesting it has more room to grow.

U.S. Equity Research also motored higher this year on an overweight in
FedEx
stock (FDX). She notes that the analyst pinpointed a valuation disconnect between FedEx and rival
United Parcel Service
(UPS). FedEx improved some operations and capital allocation, while freight carrier Yellow’s bankruptcy boosted FedEx’s freight business. Another outperforming transportation name,
Old Dominion Freight Line
(ODFL), is gaining market share and has improving margins and a strong management team, she says.

Monster Beverage
(MNST), which is also overweighted in the fund, has outpaced other consumer-goods companies, even as inflation has compressed multiples for most beverage makers, including Monster. The company increased margins by raising prices and reducing supply-chain costs, while demand for energy drinks is expected to stay strong.

Geopolitical issues, inflation worries, and concerns over interest rates are likely to keep investors on their toes into the year’s end after leading to market malaise in October. Investor pessimism and market volatility could lead to stock mispricings, Holcomb says, giving the nimble U.S. Equity Research team opportunities to add new names or adjust portfolio weightings.

“When we identify differences in fundamentals, versus where the market thinks they are, that’s really how we win long term,” she says.

Email: editors@barrons.com

Read the full article here

Share.

Leave A Reply

Your road to financial

freedom starts here

With our platform as your starting point, you can confidently navigate the path to financial independence and embrace a brighter future.

Registered address:

First Floor, SVG Teachers Credit Union Uptown Building, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines

CFDs are complex instruments and have a high risk of loss due to leverage and are not recommended for the general public. Before trading, consider your level of experience, relevant knowledge, and investment objectives and seek financial advice. Vittaverse does not accept clients from OFAC sanctioned jurisdictions. Also, read our legal documents and make sure you fully understand the risks involved before making any trading decision